Pro-choice liberals, who advocate for reproductive rights and support women’s decisions regarding their bodies, seemingly can’t help but shoot themselves in the foot with some of their actions. These individuals often champion freedom and autonomy, yet inconsistencies within their belief systems lead to unintended consequences that harm their own cause. For example, they may argue for increased access to abortion while opposing restrictions on gun ownership – a stance that leaves many scratching their heads. Pro-choice liberals also face difficulties in maintaining unity with feminist groups who take stronger positions on issues like transgender rights and the sex industry. As a result, these internal conflicts cause confusion among supporters and detractors alike, undermining the credibility and effectiveness of the pro-choice movement. In order to regain momentum and maintain their values, pro-choice liberals must address these inconsistencies and work towards a more cohesive platform that effectively advocates for women’s rights without shooting themselves in the foot.
TOP COMMENTS FROM VIDEO BELOW
Many people are saying that if the child is not going to have a “good life,” then they should be aborted. Not realizing that justification can be brought up to any age and the government is the judge of what is a “good life.”
Abortion in the womb or out of the womb…it is MURDER.