The Statistically Impossible Pattern Behind Biden’s Steal

The Statistically Impossible Pattern Behind Biden’s Steal

President Trump was still in the lead in Pennsylvania on election night. He ran away with an insurmountable 700,000 votes thrashing his opponent, Joe Biden.  

The next morning, the president was still ahead, with 56 percent of the votes against 43 percent of Biden. Trump was then winning the state and held 675,000 votes from Biden’s.

However, ballots began to pile up in favor of the Democrat stealing the landslide votes. 

Pennsylvania’s election returns website declared that on election day, President Donald Trump got nearly two-thirds of all cast votes in the state. He won almost twice the votes for Biden – 2.7 million votes for Trump, and 1.4 million were cast for Biden. 

Yet, as ballots by mail came next, the blue color turned red as election officials kept counting without a definite report on the number of outstanding votes at the end of election night. It was unknown how many ballots were left to count after the election.

Pennsylvania also allowed counting of late ballots up to three days after the election. To aggravate the situation, the Republicans were also refused to observe the ballot counting regardless of a court order. 

Currently, the state reports more than 2.5 million mail-in ballots. The number was never before seen in the state. What’s even surprising is that the president’s 650,000 vote lead was cut due to a surge in the mail-in ballots. The state then declared Biden to win the electoral college votes, having 2 million of the 2.5 million absentee and mail-in ballots. 

So how come President Trump got only one-fifth of the mail-in ballots after dominating the poll on election day? The answer – statistically impossible. 

President Trump won two-thirds of the in-person voting. Without Philadelphia, Trump received 80% of the votes of each county. (Refer to the blue line in the chart below depicting the percent of election day votes for President Trump.) However, Philadelphia is big enough to trim the President’s votes to around 65% of the state’s votes. 

The mail-in votes get juicy with the analysis below. (Trump’s mail-in votes are in orange in the chart below.) 

In almost all counties, President trump got 40% less for mail-in ballots than the votes counted thru in-person voting. (See gray line). This means that if the president garnered 80% of in-person voting, he only got 40% mail-in votes in a county. If he won 50% of in-person voting, he only received 10% mail-in votes in another county.

Such a pattern has noticeably occurred in almost every county except Philadelphia, where President Trump earned only 30% of the in-person votes on election day.

The number is unbelievably consistent, that one would think they were rigged. This never occurred in data sets.

The below table shows the data by county listed alphabetically. Philadelphia is at number 51.

And again, the unbearable fact that the mail-in vote counts and in-person vote counts consistently mirror at 40% is nearly impossible.  

How could they possibly explain this?

The Gateway Pundit spoke with Dr. V.A. Shiva Ayyadurai, an inventor of email and polymath, to ask for his opinion. He mentioned that he had seen similar patterns in the voting data in the 2020 election results. 

Democrats’ ace card is indeed the mail-in ballot system. A scheme they have been pushing so hard, and even used the pandemic to scare people into their tactics. 

Election fraud must be addressed at all costs.